Snowpiercer and the Psychology of Control

Imagine living each day consumed solely by the question: “Will I eat today?” In Bong Joon-ho’s hauntingly powerful film Snowpiercer (2013), this stark scenario unfolds aboard a train endlessly circling a frozen Earth. Passengers in the train’s Tail section survive on minimal rations and huddle for warmth, their existence reduced entirely to basic survival.

Psychologically, these Tail passengers are stranded at the very bottom of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, focused solely on physiological necessities like food, water, and shelter. Dreams of freedom, love, or personal fulfillment are illusions, entirely out of reach. Their daily existence is defined purely by scarcity.

Learned Helplessness: The Psychological Cage

When individuals repeatedly face uncontrollable, adverse conditions, they often internalize the belief that they have no control over their circumstances—a state psychologists call learned helplessness. This phenomenon is vividly illustrated among Snowpiercer’s oppressed passengers. After years of failed revolts and relentless punishment, many in the Tail section become passive and resigned. They don’t lack courage or desire, but they've learned through brutal experience that resistance is futile.

Their silence and passivity aren't signs of agreement or satisfaction but symptoms of psychological conditioning. Survival depends on compliance, reinforcing their feelings of powerlessness and perpetuating a cycle that’s difficult to break.

Scarcity as a Tool of Tyranny

Snowpiercer powerfully portrays how scarcity can be weaponized by authoritarian control. By restricting access to essential resources—like warmth, food, and security—the train’s ruling elite ensures obedience. Tail passengers remain too exhausted and demoralized to mount effective resistance.

This dynamic isn’t confined to fiction. Historically and even today, scarcity distracts people from asserting their rights or freedoms. Under Saddam Hussein’s oppressive regime, for example, Iraqis often prioritized securing basic necessities over political dissent. Similarly, contemporary economic pressures—like soaring grocery prices—can limit civic engagement, trapping citizens in day-to-day survival concerns instead of broader societal change.

Visit HealoVerse to explore the AI-powered VR Psychotherapy in combination with at-home ketamine

Breaking Free: Restoring Agency and Hope

Yet, Snowpiercer also shows that learned helplessness is not unbreakable. When Curtis (Chris Evans) and other leaders ignite another revolt, their actions rekindle hope among the downtrodden passengers. The key psychological insight here is that reintroducing even a small sense of agency can challenge and dismantle the entrenched helplessness.

Curtis's rebellion demonstrates the power of believing change is possible, illustrating that true freedom begins with reclaiming psychological autonomy, even amidst severe scarcity.

Psychological Lessons from Snowpiercer

Ultimately, Snowpiercer isn’t merely a dystopian thriller—it’s a profound psychological exploration of how control can be maintained through scarcity and learned helplessness. It reveals that survival-level concerns can suppress broader aspirations for freedom and autonomy.

The film urges us to recognize the psychological chains created by scarcity and hopelessness. Only by acknowledging these mental prisons can we begin to dismantle them—both within fictional train cars and in our own, very real lives.